The only argument for TopTenReviews, is that it includes absolutely every possible review going for the product, this isn't exactly a strength, as I've shown above. The games section on TopTenReviews does not have the same traffic as Game Rankings, and nor does it have the industry influence as Metacritic. And TopTenReviews wasn't added to Template:VG Reviews without any discussion or consensus, unlike the bulk of the sources which were discussed when the template was created. That's all that World of Video Games entails. That"Hello, everyone! My name is Kenny Flynn and this is my first review of any game"is a user review is speculation.Any reviewer has written his "first" review.- 43.244.132.168 ( talk) 00:52, (UTC) Reply Bullshit, the contact page I've linked to above is the submit reviews page. This is why TopTenReviews should not be cited in the reception section of articles, and it is why it should be removed from Template:VG Reviews.
Hello, everyone! My name is Kenny Flynn and this is my first review of any game, so please be nice. That's because their reviews, start like such: TopTenReviews takes into account all the reviews at to generate their collated score for Ocarina, yet other aggregators take absolutely nothing from World of Video Games. Reviews from World of Video Games, are user submitted, at, although I guess the site is no longer live. Now, the website doesn't claim this, but if you look at the expert reviews, you'll find that it draws the final score from websites such as. He insists on adding a link to TopTenReviews, I have removed it on multiple occasions because its an unreliable source which relies on user-reviews. Wikipedian06, even though originally vehemently arguing against listing any form of rankings at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Archive_34#Potential_issue_with_GameRankings.2FMetaCritic_-_add_language_to_guidelines.3F, is now firmly pro-ranking websites, having added them to GTA IV, and now at Ocarina of Time.
I've been reverting back and forth between a User:Wikipedian06 and an anon at Ocarina of Time over the inclusion of a GameRankings style reviews collation site. TopTenReviews is a shitty source for games reception data, and shouldn't be touched 19 Added list support to vgproj template.17 B4U the song vs B4U Movies and B4U Music.16 Partner peer review for Lince (tank) now open.13 Left Behind: Eternal Forces Reception.12.3 This decision and impact at WP:FLC.10 GH Taskforce or even an Activision one.8 90 minute cut scenes.what the bloody hell?! The reason why MGS4 might change reviews forever(EGM is screwed).7 The "fringes" of our scope: do we include these sorts of articles?.6 No link to "Reliable sources" sub-page.2 Notability/Relevance of Template:VG Reviews Sites.1 TopTenReviews is a shitty source for games reception data, and shouldn't be touched.
0 kommentar(er)
